Current:Home > ContactExxon Relents, Wipes Oil Sands Reserves From Its Books -FundGuru
Exxon Relents, Wipes Oil Sands Reserves From Its Books
View
Date:2025-04-17 18:52:22
ExxonMobil announced Wednesday that it had wiped off its books all 3.5 billion barrels of tar sands oil reserves at one of its projects in Canada. Because of recent low oil prices, the company said none of those reserves can be considered economical according to the accounting rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The accounting change at its Kearl project, a momentous if expected development, represented a turnaround for the company, which has long resisted calls to revise its reserves estimates. Over the past decade, Exxon had steadily increased its holdings in Canada’s tar sands to become a leading producer there.
Exxon also removed from its books 800 million barrels of oil-equivalent reserves in North America, though the reductions were offset by the addition of 1 billion barrels of oil and gas elsewhere.
Exxon said in October that low prices would likely force it to “de-book” up to 4.6 billion barrels of reserves in its end-of-year accounting. Securities and Exchange Commission rules allow oil companies to count reserves only if they are profitable based on average prices over the previous year.
But while the accounting change removes billions of dollars worth of tar sands investments from the company’s annual report, and is watched closely by investors, it will not directly affect operations. Exxon plans to continue operating its Kearl project, and said it will add back the reserves if oil prices rise or costs drop. After the reduction, the company now reports holding 1.3 billion barrels of tar sands reserves.
Exxon will hold an analyst meeting on March 1.
Earlier this week, ConocoPhillips said it had reduced its oil sands reserves by more than 1 billion barrels, bringing its total to 1.2 billion for 2016. These moves had been expected, as low oil prices have placed a heavy burden on tar sands projects, which are among the most expensive and polluting sources of oil.
veryGood! (52589)
Related
- Rams vs. 49ers highlights: LA wins rainy defensive struggle in key divisional game
- 4 shot, 2 critically injured, in the midst of funeral procession near Chicago
- In memoriam: Female trailblazers who leapt over barriers to fight for their sisters
- Here's How North West and Kim Kardashian Supported Tristan Thompson at a Lakers Game
- San Francisco names street for Associated Press photographer who captured the iconic Iwo Jima photo
- Tots on errands, phone mystery, stinky sweat benefits: Our top non-virus global posts
- Vanderpump Rules Reunion Trailer Sees Ariana Madix & Cast Obliterate Tom Sandoval & Raquel Leviss
- Lawyers Challenge BP Over ‘Greenwashing’ Ad Campaign
- Meet the volunteers risking their lives to deliver Christmas gifts to children in Haiti
- Politics & Climate Change: Will Hurricane Florence Sway This North Carolina Race?
Ranking
- The Daily Money: Spending more on holiday travel?
- Kate Spade 24-Hour Flash Deal: Get This $280 Crossbody Bag for Just $59
- U.S. Climate Pledge Hangs in the Balance as Court Weighs Clean Power Plan
- Kendall Jenner Shares Cheeky Bikini Photos From Tropical Getaway
- Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
- Lessons from Germany to help solve the U.S. medical debt crisis
- Taylor Swift and Matty Healy Spotted Holding Hands Amid Dating Rumors
- Brain Scientists Are Tripping Out Over Psychedelics
Recommendation
At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
Dakota Pipeline Was Approved by Army Corps Over Objections of Three Federal Agencies
Taylor Swift and Matty Healy Spotted Holding Hands Amid Dating Rumors
Today’s Climate: August 24, 2010
Person accused of accosting Rep. Nancy Mace at Capitol pleads not guilty to assault charge
What’s Causing Antarctica’s Ocean to Heat Up? New Study Points to 2 Human Sources
Donald Trump’s Record on Climate Change
Today’s Climate: September 13, 2010