Current:Home > FinanceIs $4.3 million the new retirement number? -FundGuru
Is $4.3 million the new retirement number?
View
Date:2025-04-18 20:34:39
One of the toughest things about saving for retirement is that it's hard to estimate how much money you'll actually need to cover your senior living costs in full. After all, there are so many factors that will go into that equation, including your retirement age, the state of your health, your desired lifestyle, and inflation, to name only some.
In fact, you'll often hear that it's wise to aim for $1 million in savings because that sum is more likely to be enough to cover your costs throughout your senior years. Or is it?
The reality is that $1 million is an easy, clean number to land on. But for many retirees, it might fall short.
In fact, in a recent New York Life survey, today's workers said it would take an average of $4,342,378.86 in savings to be able to retire comfortably. But given where savers are at today, that sort of balance may be unrealistic.
Do you really need $4.3 million in retirement?
While Americans might think it will take around $4.3 million to retire without financial worries, their current 401(k) and IRA balances tell a much different story. That's because the average saver today only has $135,161.50 socked away.
Granted, it may be possible to grow $135,000 and change into roughly $4.3 million. Let's say you're 31 years old with $135,000 in savings and you want to retire at 67, which is full retirement age for Social Security purposes. If you were to stock away $1,000 a month between now and then at an average annual 8% return, which is a bit below the stock market's average, then you'd get to $4.4 million in time for retirement.
But a lot of people can't part with $12,000 a year for retirement savings purposes. And also, a lot of people who have $135,000 and change in savings are much older than their early 30s. So for a lot of people, getting to the $4.3 million mark isn't so doable.
Of course, it's important to ask the question of whether $4.3 million is really the right number to be aiming for. And the answer is that for some people, it might be.
But again, there's no single retirement savings target that guarantees you financial security throughout your senior years. So rather than fixate on a number that a survey arrives at, a better bet is to do your own number-crunching and planning to come up with a savings goal that's likely to allow you to meet your personal needs.
Remember, someone who wants to spend retirement gardening and spending time with family might need a lot less money than someone intending to retire in a large city and enjoy nightlife all the time. So while it may not be a bad idea for you to aim for $4.3 million in savings, you also shouldn't feel compelled to.
And do keep in mind that while $4.3 million is clearly a lot of money, even that sum doesn't guarantee that you won't run out. If you aren't careful, it's possible to spend down a nest egg of any size too quickly. So no matter what savings number you land on, you should not only work your hardest to attain it, but also, manage your money strategically once retirement does roll around.
The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.
Offer from the Motley Fool:The $21,756 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. For example: one easy trick could pay you as much as $21,756 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Simply click here to discover how to learn more about these strategies.
veryGood! (272)
Related
- Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
- Paul Alexander, Who Spent 70 Years in an Iron Lung, Dead at 78
- A proposal to merge 2 universities fizzles in the Mississippi Senate
- Gwyneth Paltrow Reveals How She Felt After Kourtney Kardashian's Poosh Was Compared to Goop
- Tom Holland's New Venture Revealed
- Love Is Blind's Trevor Sova Sets the Record Straight on Off-Screen Girlfriend Claims
- Texas man who used an iron lung for decades after contracting polio as a child dies at 78
- Utah man dies in avalanche while backcountry skiing in western Montana
- Could your smelly farts help science?
- Michigan shooter's father James Crumbley declines to testify at involuntary manslaughter trial
Ranking
- Angelina Jolie nearly fainted making Maria Callas movie: 'My body wasn’t strong enough'
- Storm carrying massive ‘gorilla hail’ threatens parts of Kansas and Missouri
- Storm carrying massive ‘gorilla hail’ threatens parts of Kansas and Missouri
- Lindsay Lohan Reveals Plans for Baby No. 2
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- Last suspect sought in deadly bus shooting in Philadelphia, police say
- Watch a tortoise in Florida cozy up for a selfie with a camera
- Lindsay Lohan Reveals Plans for Baby No. 2
Recommendation
The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
Viral bald eagle parents' eggs unlikely to hatch – even as they continue taking turns keeping them warm
Censorship efforts at libraries continued to soar in 2023, according to a new report
Neti pots, nasal rinsing linked to another dangerous amoeba. Here's what to know.
The FBI should have done more to collect intelligence before the Capitol riot, watchdog finds
Brittany Cartwright Gets Candid About Scary Doubts She Had Before Jax Taylor Separation
Biden heads to the Michigan county emerging as the swing state’s top bellwether
Dollar Tree to close nearly 1,000 stores, posts surprise fourth quarter loss